Project success depends more and more on the effective communications of people collaborating on them. Long time ago, the sponsor directed project manager on what to do. PM produced documents, commanded and controlled team members’ daily tasks, and reported timely to sponsor in the periodic project review. Today’s projects are not managed that way anymore.
In this hyper connected society we live on, with the project economy on the rise, many stakeholders need to be engaged beyond review meetings. Team members, many of them working in virtual teams, are expected to comment proactively on problems, alternatives, workarounds, conflicts, needs, etc. Project managers are not good professionals if they just follow orders. They need to be proactive to manage risks, model requirements, be on time, on cost, maximize value, etc. Project managers are not alone in management. We need project management teams, instead. Communication technology enhances distribute collaboration and continuous feedback on people, projects, programs and portfolios.
PMPeople enhances feedback on team members and projects performance.
Feedback on People
Feedback on team members can be provided by any user with access to the project. Feedback data includes a section aimed to the team member. Other section, with confidencial information, is only accessible to resource managers.
- New feedbacks can be added by clicking plus icon [+].
- Existing feedbacks can be filtered by dates.
- Each feedback includes a scoring from 1 (poor) to 5 (awsome), and some optional positive and/or negative comments, in the corresponding box, to be shown to Team Member, not mentioning author.
- Text box entitled “Share to Managers” will be displayed to the Resource Manager, showing who is the author and the project role. This comment is aimed to register confidential information not to be shown to the Team Member.
- While the project is not closed (that is, not int state “closing” or “archived”) author is able to edit data anytime. Records can also be deleted by clicking cross icon [X].
- First, they must choose a project from the list of assignations.
- Existing feedbacks can be filtered by dates.
- TMs are not displayed feedback authors names.
- Each feedback includes a scoring from 1 (poor) to 5 (awsome), and some optional positive and/or negative comments.
- First, they must choose a project from the list of assignations for that TM.
- Existing feedbacks can be filtered by dates.
- RM can read feedback authors names and roles.
- Each feedback includes a scoring from 1 (poor) to 5 (awsome), and some optional positive and/or negative comments.
- Text box “Share to Managers” contain the confidential feedback not to be displayed to the Team Member.
Feedback on Projects
Project stakeholders, requesters and sponsors can provide feedback on projects.
- New feedbacks can be added by clicking plus icon [+].
- Existing feedbacks can be filtered by dates.
- Each feedback includes a scoring from 1 (poor) to 5 (awsome), and some optional positive and/or negative comments, in the corresponding box, to be shown to the project manager, along with the author.
- While the project is not closed (that is, not int state “closing” or “archived”) author is able to edit data anytime. Records can also be deleted by clicking cross icon [X].
- Existing feedbacks can be filtered by dates.
- PM can read feedback authors names and roles.
- Each feedback includes a scoring from 1 (poor) to 5 (awsome), and some optional positive and/or negative comments.
# Tag# agile# Agile project management tool# Construction project management software# Digital Project Management tool# Online project management solution# Professional Project Management Tool# Project collaboration tool# Project management tool# Project Portfolio Management Software# Project portfolio management software